There are a large amount of websites on the market that utilize the word "future" inside their domain name, but are they really futurist type websites? It is advised often by print publishers and editors that the term "future" is a good word to used in titles, since it grabs people's attention. But, when people utilize the word future and then don't give predictions or future accounts, then are they really deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I think they are.
Recently, an editor of another of things type website asked me to create a column, however in reviewing the web site I discovered it to be underwhelming on the futuristic aspect, and more heavy in to the scientific news arena. Indeed, if the magazine is seriously interested in "The Future" then why are the articles about new scientific innovations in today's period or happening right now? - asked myself.
www.chatrush.com
raadpleger.nl
https://678-hd.com/
www.naiwaennet.com
It seems like they're seriously interested in scientific discovery that has already happened, not what'll maintain the future. That's just boring, more science news, regurgitation, typical human tactic of re-packaging information. I do believe they could do better, but are holding themselves back, afraid to create people think, worried that you will get too far from your own mainstream, quote "core" group of viewers, which I think they do not even understand.
Obviously, being an entrepreneur, I understand exactly why they get it done this way. It is because they want to make money and thus sink to less amount of readership, while still pretending to share with you the ongoing future of stuff. When the editor wished to guard such comments, the indication was that the website was mostly about scientific news.
Yes, I observe that the website is mainly a news site and I ask what does that have related to the ongoing future of stuff? Shouldn't the web site be called NSIN.com or something like this; for New Science Innovation News? If the website is about Science News and is a collection of everyone else's news, then it is a copy site of a style that is already used and not unique. Thus, the information is therefore the exact same, so even if the articles are written more clearly and easier to know, which can be nice, still what's the value to a "science news junky" as you can find not many articles on the internet site compared with their competition?
Should they called themselves a news site, then you can have "futurist type columnists" anyway, who might project these scientific news items into the future or they may keep consitently the "Future Stuff" motif and promote the futurist columnists.
This would be a training to all "Futuristic" type websites as an instance study. If you take the future thinkers to your website and have nothing to show them, they will leave. If you utilize trickery to get regular readers there, you're doing a serious disservice to the ongoing future of mankind, by promoting present inventions as the be all end all. In either case, it's unethical to utilize this tactic on future of things type websites.
No comments:
Post a Comment